BAGGY CHECKED CASH CAT’S BIGGEST BAGS
What's actually in Cash Cat's biggest bags?
Cash Cat's biggest holders picked one bag. And kept every receipt.
45 of 60 Dust Lord · median largest position 99% · median 27 dust tokens per wallet

LARGE-HOLDER SAMPLE · sampled 2026-08-26 UTC · rules v0.2 · re-run 2026-09-23
SAMPLED
60 WALLETS
ONE-BAG RATE
67%
of all 60 bags
MEDIAN LARGEST POSITION
99%
of all 60 bags
MEDIAN BAG AURA
5,733
of 60 sampled
What’s actually in the bags?
The median share of priced value in each category, across the sample. Described, not graded — no category here is better than another.
Composition — not measured in this run.
Who these wallets are
Archetypes under v0.2. Any group smaller than five wallets is merged into “other” so no individual can be picked out of it.
- THE DUST LORD · 45 of 60 wallets75%
- THE MAILBOX · 6 of 60 wallets10%
- OTHER (CELLS UNDER 5, MERGED) · 9 of 60 wallets15%
How Baggy reacted
Reaction spread — not measured in this run.
Bag Aura spread
Median 5,733 · mean 5,356 of 10,000. Wealth is never an input.
- LOW · 9 of 60 wallets15%
- MID · 42 of 60 wallets70%
- HIGH · 9 of 60 wallets15%
Most common badges
- DUST LORD · 55
- LIQUIDITY ENJOYER · 43
- FULL SEND · 26
- ONE BAG · 14
- DEGEN CARD · 11
Also holding
Share of this sample that also holds another reported community’s token.
Cross-community overlap — not measured in this run.
Method
- Contract
- 0x020bfc650a365f8bb26819deaabf3e21291018b4
- Chain
- Robinhood Chain (eip155:4663)
- Snapshot
- 2026-08-26T14:06:34Z UTC
- Population
- every address holding CASHCAT on Robinhood Chain (82,420 at sampling); only self-custody addresses are observable — Robinhood app customers hold custodially and cannot appear
- Sampling frame
- the explorer's holder list, largest balances first (top 100 fetched)
- Selection
- the first 60 addresses that are not contracts, pools, bridges, exchanges or project treasuries, after skipping the three largest holders
- Sample size
- 60 wallets
- Exclusions
- contracts and pools; bridge, exchange and null addresses by explorer tag; project treasury addresses; the three largest holders
- Coverage
- 60 of 60 wallets fully priced (concentration scored); 0 not — shown separately, never filed as an archetype by default
- Method
- sample of the largest self-custody holders on Blockscout, exchange/LP and contract addresses excluded; archetypes under rules v0.1.1
- Rules
- v0.2
- Next re-run
- 2026-09-23 UTC
Notes
- all 60 results were MODERATE or HIGH confidence
- 6 of 60 wallets have never sent a transaction (THE MAILBOX — a data state, not a conduct type); they are counted, not typed
- sample of top holders skews toward larger, older wallets; not representative of all holders
- re-run 2026-08-26 under pricing coverage v2 and aura/archetypes v0.2 — the earlier report (42% One-Bag Maxi, median 6,131 (16 of 60 wallets had unscored concentration)) filed wallets with unscored concentration as Mid-Curve by default; its verdict "Cash Cat's biggest holders didn't diversify. They picked." was replaced; the full before/after is on /status and in the repo
- oneBagRate derived from ONE BAG + FULL SEND badge counts (largest position ≥ 90%)
Previous runs
This is the first published run. Earlier numbers are left standing when it is re-run.
What’s in your bag?
Same check, same rules, one wallet. Read-only — paste the address, nothing to connect.
No wallet is named and no per-wallet row is published; cells below five are merged. A team may ask once, within 48 hours of publication, for a report to be withdrawn; the withdrawal is honored and logged on /receipts. This report is also served as JSON at /api/communities/cashcat.json (CC BY 4.0, aggregates only).